As these full blood grouping details are not that readily available in
reference library texts I will repeat them here. The overriding significance of
blood groups and paternity is the ability to rule out a bloodline link, it cannot
prove a link.
Details taken from Human Anatomy and Physiology by D. V.
Wynsberghe
Parents blood / Child's blood types / Child's blood types
types / possible / impossible
A and A A or O AB or B
A and B A or B or AB or O not applicable
A and AB A or B or AB O
A and O A or O AB or B
B and B B or O A or AB
B and AB A or B or AB O
B and O B or O A or AB
AB and AB A or B or AB O
AB and O A or B AB or O
O and O O A or B or AB
For the search-engines as the following material
has been mis-ascribed elsewhere - for E E Phillipp read E E Philipp.
From
Philipp, E. Discussion: moral, social and ethical
issues. In Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer.
Ciba Foundation Symposium (Vol. 17), G.E.W. Wostenholme
andD.W. Fitzsimons (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Excerpta
Medica, North-Holland, 1973, pp. 63-66.
Quote
PHILIPP:
We blood-tested some patients in a town in south-east England,
and found that 30% of the husbands could not have been the fathers
of their children. ...
KILLBRANDON:
Mr Philipp,surely the figure of 30% must be a minimum?
What you established was that 30% could not be the children of
their mother's husband, not that 70% of them were?
PHILIPP:
Yes, it is a minimum. We were screening some female
patients by testing their husbands for their blood groups, because
we were interested in antibody formation in correlation with
the ABO groups as well as the rhesus groups. From our results
we suddenly realised that 30% of the children could not have
been fathered by the men whose blood group we analysed.
STALLWORTHY:
What was the extent of that group?
PHILLIP:
Not large - between 200 and 300 women - but large enough
to give a great shock.
J H EDWARDS:
... Analysis of some blood group data ,making allowance for the
fact that one could not detect all the illegitimacies, showed that in the
1950s in the West Isleworth area about 50% of premarital conceptions
were not fathered by the apparent father. As the apparent fathers
were questioned while visiting their wives immediately after
the birth, most of them obviously thought they were the father. ...
End Quote
I had asked my GP ages ago if he was able to have an exchange of letters
with another GP concerning blood groups. If the relevant details and
permissions were forthcoming from the other parties then this was possible. If
Sheila was not lying then all this argy-bargy could have been avoided yonks ago
. I knew Sheila was always lying to me but I assumed naively that she would not
lie to her own children.
Section 11,I now know that Kevin's father died
when Nuala was eight years old. Fergal must be a chameleon. At different times
different people have told me that Fergal looks like Kevin, Kevin's
mother, Kevin's father and myself as a teenager.
Section 12, One time on
the phone Sheila gloated that Fergal had done arts subjects at "A" level instead
of "pissy f .. king science subjects which any moron could deal with"-my
subjects.
Section 13,I no longer listen to anything that this woman may say
down the phone. I just say "put it in writing" and slam the phone down. It
does of course mean I cannot use my telephone answering machine anymore. She
has still not put a single comment in writing.
Chapter 5
Flaky Pastry
13 Mar 99
186 Alton Rd
Sheila, I don't rate your solicitor much the first advice
she should have given you was to make sure any communication with someone you
are in dispute with should be in writing. Thank you for mentioning psychiatric
problems. In the last year I have sought psychiatric help but on your behalf.
I took along tapes and transcripts of your phone calls, relevant anecdotes from
20 odd years ago etc. and obtained a very useful diagnosis. Your problems lay
in the areas of dissociation and fugue, specifically Osiris complex / MPD. The
reason Nuala and Fergal are playing ostrich is because they must have picked up
a number of the symptoms that you've displayed but are petrified as to what it
all means. This letter is the first part of treatment. Namely awareness of the
problem. Multiple Personality Disorder as far as I know is treated in a talk it
through therapy fashion. Additionally perhaps hypnosis to confront early
childhood trauma and dissociation (usually sexual molestation). I pass the
following info on gratis that many (maybe the majority) of MPD cases are
diagnosed after failed suicide attempts. Hopefully this letter should avoid
this scenario. Because you have been shown personal letters between me and both
Nuala and Fergal you won't mind me sending copies of this letter to both Fergal
and Nuala.
signed Paul Nutteing p. s. Because you are a proven liar I take
as much notice of your phone calls as the telesales junk calls that come down my
phone line.
The above letter I rattled off after the following message
left on my answer machine.
12 March 1999 Right Paul this is Sheila again lets make a few things quite
clear. I've no intention of putting anything down in writing to you OK. Lets
get that right from the start. Now the second thing, if you continue in this way
I have been in touch with a solicitor over the last year or so about all this.
She does feel that we have grounds for a case of harassment against you. Now if
we get one more letter I promise you we will start instigating proceedings
because all of us have had enough. We have plenty of evidence of your
maliciousness in the letters that you have sent. Nuala has shown me and the
ones that Fergal has given me. Now you know if you can't get the message then I
really do suggest that you've got a problem and suggest you seek some advice
about your mental health GOODBYE.
I am now in a position to go into more detail about the MPD diagnosis. One
thing I forgot to mention to this psychiatric medic was that I suspected that
Sheila had had anorexia. This was sort of confirmed by Nuala.
One of the
old pictures I had of Sheila definitely showed the sunken "Belsen like" cheeks.
And another example of weird behaviour that at the time I couldn't fathom.
Myself and Sheila had been in a pub for perhaps quarter of an hour. She got up
and went to the toilet and didn't come out for ages. The next woman to go in
there was one of the bar staff. She came across Sheila in what I now know to be
in a cattonic state. The bar-girl asked me to go into the ladies to do
something. She was coming out of this state when I entered and of course wanted
to know what I was doing in the ladies as she had absolutely no knowledge of
being in a "locked-up" state, weird.
The following is an example of this
woman's recent behaviour on 07 July 1997. I was woken up eventually at just
before 1 o'clock in the morning. Transcript of the messages in one session left
on my answer machine.
Message 1
Hello Paul, its me Sheila, pick up the phone I know you're there Paul. Its me
Sheila, lift up the phone OK be a silly bugger I know your there.
Message 2
Paul basically its Sheila again. If you don't pick up this phone I'm going
to come round and slaughter you. Now will you pick up the bloody phone. I know
your there come on. I'm going to ring you in 5 minutes I want you to pick up
the phone please.
Message 3
Well Paul, its Sheila again. Well you've had you're chance to pick up the
phone to discuss this in a civilised fashion so tomorrow I'm coming down with
the twins and we can discuss this in a civilised fashion. I'm sure we can sort
something out if only you would just get rid of your idea of me of 20 odd years
ago and understand that I'm a different person now. I'm not out to get you
alright but I am protective of my children and we need to sort some things out
Yes ? OK see you tomorrow, Bye
The next time the phone rang I woke, went
downstairs, and picked it up. There followed another ridiculous
conversation with this woman that just gets nowhere. I will only be convinced
by forensic proof, blood groups or some such, not verbal from this woman. But of
course the last thing she can do is put anything in writing.
I showed the
transcript of the above answer machine messages to a local social worker that I
know. She was concerned for the welfare of the twins. There's irony for
you, Sheila from her own mouth, is one of those social workers that go into other
people's families to split them up.
It would appear that Sheila has at least 3 separate personalities. I wish I
had known of this diagnosis earlier. I would have asked her what name she was
calling herself at these different times as this is apparently characteristic.
They are a small child, what I call the "super honest" character and the "essence
of evil" character.
I have recently traced someone who lived in the same house as us in the mid
70s and we have not been in contact since then. Not a bad trace for me as a
rookie private investigator as he had changed his name. I had asked if he was
aware of any psychiatric problems with Sheila when he knew her, not leading him
any more than this. I quote from his letter of 25 August 1999, verbatim except
for the usual change of name.
"At the time you and Sheila were in your relationship. I remember that I
tried to remain uninvolved with it, let you get on with it as you both seemed to
protect your privacy, a difficult thing to do in a shared house. Neither of you
discussed your relationship apart from the occasional word perhaps to try to
explain things. ... One night about 2. 00 am perhaps, Sheila came into my room
and climbed into my bed even before I was awake, the touch of her hand on the
back of my neck woke me. She was upset and wanted comforting. Due to your
relationship I did not comfort her and due to her lack of personal hygiene she
was told to leave very quickly. "
This was the behaviour of a small child frightened by a nightmare, say, and
crawled into her parents bed but this is a 22 year old. Another odd night-time
activity was her pissing in a metal litter bin in the sitting room. It could
only have been her (or myself of course) as it occurred once when there was only
the two of us in the house.
The "super-honest" character I've outlined
before, I assume it gave her some sort of sexual gratification.
The "essence
of evil" character I only came across once. It was probably on a Monday/Tuesday
night. She came back the usual time for her after being with Kevin or whoever
probably about 1 am. She said that her sister (I forget which but that is not
relevant) was coming over to Winchester the following Saturday. She wanted me
to have sex with her sister. There followed about 2 hours of argument as to why
I found this a total no-no. She just went on and on about how it would please
her so much etc, etc. It was now about 3 in the morning and at that time I was
rising for work at about 6. 30 so to get some sleep I said I would have sex
with her sister. After all Saturday was some time off and she would probably
have forgotten about it by then or I could disappear for the day. Then all hell
broke loose. She started punching and kneeing me saying how dare I consider
such a revolting idea. I restrained her flailing arms and bundled her out of
the room. It was an old door that had a bolt lock on it and this was the first
time I used it. This woman ,bare footed, started kicking the door and shouting
abuse ,waking all the neighbours ... Not prepared to put in print ...
... Another anecdote concerned an incident when someone was stabbed. I
was not there at the time. The story was related to me by two separate people
who were present. There were differences in their stories and I tried recently
to obtain confirmation before printing from the person stabbed but he has not
replied to my letter. ...
About ten years ago the newspapers carried a story of a man terrorising a
village with a sword and machete. The newspapers didn't mention any names but
did mention the name of the village where Sheila's parents lived at the time.
I would never have known that this person who was overpowered by a SWAT team
and carted off to mental institution was Sheila's father. Carol had informed me
in the following week, why is another matter. As far as I can see Sheila has
inherited something of her father's condition, presumably schizophrenia.
I have stated this woman, in a sexual context, had a "super-honest"
personality relating intimate details of men she was having sex with. She
referred once to having an on going lesbian relationship with someone.
Curiously she did not go into detail and did not mention her name. From
indirect evidence this other person was someone perhaps 10 years older than
herself, called Nuala. This was a thoroughly corrupt individual. Her reputation
preceded her and I had nothing to do with her. She was into witchcraft which
to my mind is an opportunity to gain mind control over others. She used to abuse
her own child by forcing him to sleep in a basement coal hole. With
hindsight, this woman and her male partner were well on the way to becoming a
Fred and Rosemary West. In 1979 this male partner got wind that he was to be
arrested and charged with the most gross imaginable forms of child sex abuse.
He promptly killed his son and himself. Sheila told me that she had named her
daughter, MY daughter, after this evil woman. This is one thing I have not told
my daughter.
When in this "super-honest" personality Sheila would inform people about all
sorts of sensational things. Sometimes these stories would be told back to her
in her primary personality.
Of course she had no recollection of ever saying
such stuff.
The only way she could explain this was that these other people
were spreading vicious rumours. Little did she know that she herself was the
rumour monger.
Chapter 6
Communication Breakdown
Anyone would think I had
forged Nuala's birth certificate. Along with a begging letter for 500
quid, which I decided to pay over, she included the following amazing
justification. "Mum has never asked for any child support which she would have
been quite entitled to. " I had to reply: "Sheila had never wanted me to pay
child support as this would have meant continuing contact with you and Fergal.
She made a parting threat that if I should pursue you or Fergal then Kevin had
arranged with a bunch of fairground heavies to come round tooled up and sort me
out. "
"The first point of call for the powers that be would be the General Record
Office where they would find that Kevin is your official father on your birth
registration. If he disputed this then he would have been liable to a charge of
perjury. I can confidently assume that none of the rest of your family are
aware of me. This is the way Sheila engineered all this subterfuge".
Nuala wrote that I was "lying and deluded" and broke off all communication.
The only thing I have lied to her about was trying to disguise how Nuala was
nearly born a week or so early. Anything else is what I am saying is not in
agreement with what her mother is saying, she cannot have any verifiable proof
that I have been lying. How can Nuala have lived with this woman for 20 years
and not realise she is a pathological liar to say the least. Then the most
crass of arguments. Nuala believes her mother because she is her mother.
Chapter 7
War is Declared
As far as I am concerned my daughter telling me I was lying was the limit.
The gloves are off now. Asking around friends no one could offer any advice how
to get this woman to stop lying. I sent the problem to a national newspaper
agony aunt. A page was devoted to it on 18th June 1999 and the next week the
replies were printed. This was the same as I found among friends. I expected a
polarizing of responses between male and female but this was not the case.
There was a marked difference between parents and non parents responses.
A lot of moralising but no practical suggestions. Just a lot of "no, I
wouldn't do that if I was you". Twenty odd years ago I had quite enough of
trying to get anywhere with this woman. I could not see why I should waste a
lot of serious money in taking all this stuff to court. But, then, all I had was
some circumstantial evidence and some hearsay. In retrospect this woman only
saw me as a non-anonymous sperm-bank. Pay out for a civil court case with
unknown outcome. Then pay maintainance to support such a corrupt woman to live
with the only person she had wanted to live with from schooldays-Kevin. I'm
not that much of a wally.
Even my daughter was telling me I should go through "proper channels", take
her mother to court. Her mother didn't go through proper channels using
conspiracy and perjury. There is even less reason to waste serious money on
legal recourse. Take this sort of thing to court and all of a sudden all sorts
of stuff becomes inadmissible.
I decide to become a private investigator and trace all the close family of
Sheila and Kevin. ... Detailed explanation of how to trace people ...
I did not know the names of any of them let alone married names but in the
end found the names and addresses of two of Sheila's sisters and their mother.
Also Kevin's brother and their mother. If I sent my dozen or so point paternity
treatise I had sent to Fergal along with my written letter to Sheila about her
being a fruit cake it should force something. Sheila would have to put up or
shut up. Get an injunction or something against me or have to lie in turn to
all her close family. I got a load more crap down my phone from her, nothing in
writing from anyone let alone solicitor's communications.
Chapter 8
The McGuffin
I've never been convinced how Nuala was supposed to have discovered my
identity as her biological father. There were two separate events apparently 1)
A character in a pub called "Michael". As I consider this was as Alfred
Hitchcock termed it, a McGuffin I have given the actual name used, i.e. not
disguised as all the other names in this story. A McGuffin is a person or prop
in a story that does not necessarily exist. Its sole purpose is to propel the
plot along.
2) Finding my phone number.
I had not discussed the phone number business with anyone. Not even Nuala
as there is a flaw that Nuala would be unaware of and it opens up another can of
worms. The problem with "Michael" is he only informed Nuala something about her
origins and made no reference to Fergal's origins. Sheila, Kevin and everyone
else in Winchester at the time knew what was going on in the mid 70s. They
would only be able to tell Nuala in general terms, if anything,(no names) because
it would inevitably lead to discussing Fergal's paternity if anyone contacted
me.
There are two people I've come across who genuinely thought Kevin was
Fergal's father and me as Nuala's father. I sent similar letters to the
following to each of these people. It is quite possible that one of them
deliberately told Nuala but I took the other scenario that Nuala was digging
around.
"It is my conjecture that Nuala realised Kevin could not be her father (mis-
match of blood groups). Nether Sheila nor Kevin would explain anything and she
could have badgered you into giving my name. Then Nuala concocted the Michael
story and the phone number business to protect your identity. There is no
reason for my phone number to be in Sheila's address book. She has never phoned
me from the mid 70s up to 1996 after Nuala had contacted me. If my phone number
was in her book then it could explain who my phone pest was. For years I
received some hundred or more silent phone calls. All at about the same time of
day and another distinguishing feature which would be inadvisable for me to put
in print. Even if my number was in Sheila's book then it would hardly say 01962
-,Nuala's real father".
I got replies from both these people. Both were in Winchester in the mid
70s, knew myself, Sheila and Kevin and had continuing contact with Nuala up to the
present. One was a written reply I've quoted from below and am quite happy to
accept. From the other person, Carol, I've had a verbal denial with a refusal to
put in writing from which I infer what I choose to infer.
Extract from letter in return of post, dated 20 July 1999 Dear Paul
... Sheila and I have not been friends for well over a year now so I don't
know about anything that may be going on at the moment. I never knew much about
who the children's fathers were except that Sheila said that Nuala was yours and
Fergal Kevin's. I do feel a bit sorry for your situation ...
I hope
you will not write to me or contact me any more as although Sheila and I are no
longer friends I feel very uncomfortable being drawn into this. I wish you well
and hope that you manage to sort all this out.
Yours -
Chapter 9
The Conspiracy Widens
I've now ended up being in dispute with a professor, the head of law
faculty, of a prestigious university. As far as I knew Fergal was at this
university studying law. On May 12,1999 I phoned the university. I thought I
could contact Fergal's tutor as I knew there was some family troubles brewing
and I was in a position where I could have steered events around any exams he
may be having. I had considered it a right and proper enquiry and saw no reason
to dial 141 (to deliberately block the identity of my phone) before the
university direct line number in the law faculty. The (named) person at the
other end never asked for my name, I would have divulged if requested. She said
that a Fergal - - was not at that university in any capacity student or staff.
About 3 minutes after my call I received what I thought was a genuine but
misplaced call.
Female voice: "This is the eye unit at the hospital here returning your
message left on our answer machine but you did not leave a name". I asked out
of idle curiosity: "Is that the County Hospital?" but no reply. There was a dead
line for a couple of seconds. I continued trying to be helpful including giving
my name but there was only me on that phone number. I had been using the phone
at work. I remembered a local person is a bit dyslexic and sometimes
erroneously gives my number to people. I gave this slight variant of my number
to this caller to try. This local person never received a call from the "Eye
Unit". This facility, by looking in the phone book, is at Winchester Hospital not
the County Hospital. I only knew the eye unit had moved not where to. The
manager of the real eye unit gave me the phone numbers and contactees names on
the only two of the departments answer phone lines. Neither had any knowledge
of a message and call as I described within the previous half hour. So 3
minutes after my phone call to this university law department an investigator
misrepresenting herself had made a call to me to determine my name. There was
no reason for this investigatory behaviour in relation to my work before or
after this call 8 years in total.
I wrote to the head of this law department a lengthy letter. This detailed
the bogus call and mention of my letters to Fergal being opened and returned to
me. The usual procedure for correctly addressed mail to an incorrect addressee
is to mark "Unknown at this address" and put back in the post system. It is
only the "Dead Letter Bureau" that is then legally allowed to open such
letters, find an address and return to sender. My conjecture was that someone in
the law department after my May phone call had dialled 1471 to find my phone
number and then a follow up bogus call to get my name. A procedure that is
totally unwarranted if Fergal was not at that university. The professor
dismissed this by saying that their phones do not have a 1471 facility. By
written "cross examination" of a manager of the phone system for that university
I have the statement that these specific phones "do deliver CLI (Caller Line
Information) so your number can be seen by the called party".
I put this in writing back to professor of law to wrong foot him and have
heard nothing since.
... Advert in a local paper mentioning everyone's
real name ...
Even this failed to get any sort of response. I had
always thought someone would break rank and contact me.
I have now mailed
printed copies of this write-up to all the other parties and still no response
in any form. They must realise how disruptive and destructive this whole
process had become. But no contact other than a few attempts from someone to
leave messages on my now switched off answer machine. The caller only rang at
times she knew I would not be in to physically receive the call.
I will never understand human psychology. Why is it perfectly permissible
for the ubiquitous but ephemeral "man in the pub" to tell Nuala about her
origins. Then it is fine for Nuala to contact me on very shaky grounds (if she
is to be believed). But as soon as I who was actually there tell Fergal about
his origins it becomes the gravest of sins and no one believes me.
On going
Where will all this nonsense end. I fail to see why I should be vilified
for all this. I should be considered the wronged party in all this but it
doesn't seem to have worked out like that. Sheila is the most evil person I
have ever dealt with and to be bounced into dispute with her again by my
daughter takes the biscuit. It would seem you can only fight this sort of evil
by acting in like manner.
Paul Nutteing
Update as of 21 May, 2000
The CPS got the local police to interview me in April, 2000 about the perjury
committed in 1976 by the couple referred to in the above tract. There was a
follow-up interview with a more senior officer to clarify matters. Then on 19
May, 2000 two uniformed officers a WPC Vivian and a Sgt Davis warned me that I
was liable to be arrested under the 1997 Protection from Harassment Act if I
sent another letter to an unnamed woman in Wiltshire.
This is another
catch-all piece of legislation. So more research in the reference library. It
seems it was not possible to formulate a bill designating stalking as an
offence.
There is no specific mention of informative but unsolicited letters
being "conduct" covered by this act. So as it is not ruled out it is by default
ruled in. I can now justifiably demand that Wiltshire Police start proceedings
against all of the UK's junk letter sending industry. Personally I find junk
mail annoying but I am sure there are thousands of people in the UK who
genuinely feel harassed by the ever increasing pile of junk through their letter
boxes. I feel the ghost of A. P. Herbert coming over me. The letters I have
sent to friends and family of this evil bitch have been extremely informative
and quite specifically no threats made.
The uniformed officers only stated the complainant was a woman in
Wiltshire, no name, no OIC in Wiltshire police and no case number for when I send
my disgruntled letter to Wiltshire police. I have not sent any letters to this
woman since March, 1999.
If she feels harassed or threatened then it is due
to pressure from her own extended family. To whom I have communicated
principally a printed version of the whole of this tract to each one along with
edited highlights of the documentary evidence that it is based on. It is up to
each of them to contact me or the police if they feel threatened. Information
overload I can understand them suffering from but not feeling threatened. As
mentioned at the end of the chapter entitled "The McGuffin" that one of their
family friends (from about 1973 to 1997) wrote a very civil letter in reply to
me requesting that I send no more letters. Note I have only received this one
communication from someone who was a friend or family. I can only assume like
myself that she took exception to being lied to and ceased friendship. I sent
off a postcard to her with my name and address and just the statement "all
acknowledged" to let her know I had received her letter.
I did, though, in
March 2000 post her a copy of the above tract but sealed in another wrapper
within the cover letter identifying myself and explaining so she could
bin, unread, the contents if she so wished.
For anyone else trammelled by this 1997 act there is an interesting
exclusion in section 1,3(a) (The main offence) does not apply to a course of
conduct if the person who pursued it shows- that it was pursued for the purpose
of preventing or detecting crime.
Again just the term crime not specifically
criminal law, civil law or for that matter moral law. The "man on the Clapham
Omnibus" test for harassment is in section 1,2-"For the purposes of this
section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it
amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the
same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the
other. "May I hereby apologise to any of the readers of this whole saga who
felt themselves to be harassed by reading it.
Update on 9 August 2000
At the end of May at work I received another suspicious call. These people
misrepresenting themselves obviously have no idea of the normal calls I receive
on this phone line. This person from what they called "Army Special Projects"
makes what would be otherwise a reasonable request for information but I refuse
to divulge and put the receiver down. She phones back extremely indignant etc
but I now know when I smell a rat. I asked if they were aware of my works
address and they did. I told her to put her complaint in writing and she
slammed the phone down on me. If anyone is aware of a company or government
facility of this name I would be interested to hear. Of course no such
complaint was forthcoming.
This call was at about the time Sheila made her
statement to Wiltshire Police about my indirect "harassment". The WPC who
phoned me from Wiltshire to tell me this sounded suspiciously like the person
from "Army Special Projects".
On the 27 May Carol accompanies Sheila to my new local, Sheila would not have
known this change. She comes over to me and says she has a few things to say.
I tell her loudly so there are plenty of witnesses "put anything you have to say
in writing". I moved from my seat but she pursued me and I went down the other
end, finished my pint, and left the pub early. When will this evil bitch get it
into her thick head that too many lies have come out of her mouth for me to take
any notice of anything she may say. About an hour later the bitch starts
kicking hell out of my front door. I dial 999 in the dark and while on the
phone she tries keys in the lock and a credit card slid down the Yale catch. I
tell the police there is a psychotic woman trying to break into my house over
the noise of her trying to kick in the door. Before the police arrive she
breaks a load of glass and disappears. All this monitored by 2 independent
local witnesses. One of them challenges her as whether she had broken the
windows to which her reply was yes and then some unintelligible gibberish. She is
now justifiably cautious about being a named witness, concerned about revenge
from this "not right in the head" window-smasher. So now criminal damage of
cost ?940 so I make a statement of complaint to the police.
I happen to know someone who is a counsellor for the Samaritans and asked
for some advice. This activity is not rational and is often a "cry for help"
prior to suicide. So now I send a letter detailing everything to her employer.
Well her family won't have her treated so perhaps her line manager in Social
Services can start whatever is necessary. At least he acknowledged saying "the
contents of my letter have been noted".
On June 6th at work I receive a phone call asking for me by exact personal
name. This just does not occur unless I have asked someone to phone me at work
in reply to some personal matter, perhaps once a year. The caller would not
identify themselves so I don't confirm my identity. After flustering and trying
to get advice from someone else in the same room they then had to abandon their
call. Surprisingly the CLI comes back as a Hampshire number that I write down
but do not recognise. There is a repeat performance of this nonsense, I check
the CLI again and it is the same. I check a third time and can be as sure as
can be of this number. This number belongs to the local constituency office of
John Denham MP. I neither live or work in his constituency and there is no
reason for anyone at his office to contact me by personal name on my works phone
. So rattle off a letter to this office and in case intercepted at this
originating office a copy to the Houses of Parliament. The MP was honourable to
reply in person immediately, I quote " ... there were no members of staff in my
office at 16. 55 on the 6th June.
I am therefore unable to explain why my office telephone
number has registered on your line when you dialled 1471. I would add that as
you do not live within my constituency, I would see no reason for my staff to
contact you ... " This mystery remains as such, other than from a BT engineer it
is impossible to disguise a phone line identity as someone else's phone. Also I
later found out from someone familiar with this MP's office that it is shared
and although no staff may be present it is not locked so accessible to others
until the whole building is shut. When the police on behalf of the CPS
interviewed me about the perjury committed in 1976 the sergeant mentioned I
might find it useful to talk to my MP but this would only seem to be a
coincidence. I later found out that someone had only just started working in
his office who previously worked in social work in an environment where their
telephones routinely disguised their origination identity. They had not worked
there long enough to find out that this phone line identity was not removed from
normal public access. On a side note emergency services and security services
can routinely disable the disabling 141 or the equivalent block disabling
facility. Strange to think politicians ,as far as their phone use, are more
accountable than social workers. John Denham replied to my letter but there was
no explanation forthcoming. He is responsible for this phone line and any use
made of it. BT will confirm the time of use of a subscriber's phone if there are
suspicious circumstances. The people in his office and using that phone at that
time decided not to own-up - there was at least two people involved so yet
another conspiracy.
On the 7th June the seventh Hampshire police officer (plus two Wiltshire)
apprised me of proceedings since 28th May. Sheila had been arrested and charged
and then later cautioned. So now I have to recover losses by civil action so
first of all I send a formal notice as a recorded letter to her address. Tacked
on the heading of this letter I had to put "This notice is made under the
auspices of Section 1, subsection 3 of the 1997 Protection from Harassment Act".
I won't mind betting she throws a tantrum and tears up the letter in front of
the postman and refuses to sign the advice of delivery return postcard. I hope
postmen have some sort of training in self-defence. I send a letter to her
friends and family with my name, address and signature just saying that the
enclosed is a copy of this recorded letter in a second sealed envelope. The
theory is these letters are just unsolicited junk mail until and if the
recipient opens the enclosed envelope I still have not received a single
communication from any of Sheila's family to tell me to stop sending them
letters.
Update 19 August, 2000
Well I don't know if she threw a tantrum and started kicking the postman but
advice of delivery return postcard came back showing failed to deliver in the
relevant box.
So now Section 1, Subsection 3c of this daft 1997 act gives me
carte blanche.
ie Subsection 1 does not apply "that in the particular
circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable". Going over
to Wiltshire and smashing that evil bitch's windows would be reasonable in the
circumstances. I will settle on another round of letters to her family and
friends with no necessity for the silly secondary sealed envelope. If Sheila
has managed to suppress her suddenly becoming a criminal all her family, friends
and employer will know now. I faxed copy to her local newspapers but they would
not print a public notice that is directed to a named individual. All this
wasted money would have been far more productively spent going towards DNA
testing.
Update on September 16th 2000
A detective constable of Wiltshire police phoned me to say he wanted to
interview me and would I come over. This I did but they were too busy so I have
to go again the next week. In the meantime I send him some information in case
he was thinking of arresting me. This was notifying him that I had been
inappropriately warned earlier in the year about harassment by sending letters
to someone I had not been sending letters to. I still had not send any letters
other than the official court proceedings notification.
All the same I go
over to Wiltshire and promptly get arrested for harassment.
The custody sergeant asks me if I have any injuries. I demonstrate my
"broken" wrist and he turns away in revulsion. It is a genetic thing I explain
. So onto the taped interview with the DC and WPC "Army Special Projects". I
expected the interview to concern only the indirect "harassment" but they raised
the background so it can now all be called up in court should it all get to
court. There was a couple of dropped jaws when I explained that me and Sheila
were living together when her son was conceived. WPC read out part of Sheila's
statement to the police which stated that me being Fergal's biological father
was a "monstrous lie" and I had no grounds whatever for saying this. So my
readiness to accept any statement in writing from Sheila was misconceived, She
has lied to me, her children, presumably the rest of her family and now the police
. All I have to do is show there is reasonable doubt over Fergal's paternity.
(Her name and mine is in the archived voter's lists for 1977/78 and I can get a
number of affidavits from people including the woman who was told directly by
Sheila that I was Fergal's father). Sheila will really be in the shit
now-knowingly making a false statement to the police. Then as this was the main
plank of her case malicious prosecution of myself followed on from her statement
. My jaw dropped when these two detectives genuinely said they did not know how
to trace people.
One curious thing they said was someone or persons had been sending in
excess of 150 communications to a "Sheila" of Wiltshire Social Services. I had
no knowledge of this but trying to prove a negative is not possible. The police
thought it was me but as it was someone who had pulled stuff off this internet
file it could have been anyone including the "Michael" character who knew of
me, Nuala and her background. If anyone out in cyberland reads this could they
cease as it is not helping my case at all. The DC and WPC wanted to get home
but once started they could not stop me and the interview went on for 2 tapes.
I've never been arrested before, quite interesting. They learnt a few things
as well- bit of a change from the usual drunks and shoplifters. I was bailed to
present myself to them in a months time.
Paul Nutteing
If you have found this file in an archive then put
keyword of "Nutteing1" in a search engine to find an updated version , also some
sites do not support the .wav sound files.
.
Oh What
a Tangled Web We Weave 70K
All the actual witness statements for the
forthcoming trial can be found by clicking here Pre-Trial Witness
Statements and evidence 150K
Continuation of the sorry tale
, nutteing2 The Saga
Continues , nutteing3
Folie Á
Deux, Dissociation and Crime 40K , nutteing4
Setting-up Mirror Sites
, nutteing6
This
file as it was in 2001 on the first mirror site before the Wiltshire opposition
had it taken down
DNA profiles
and their implications , dnapr , nutteingd
Setting-up Mirror Sites
, nutteing6
There's no such thing as too much information
Don't
waste your time going to a Citizen's Advice Bureaux for advice on this sort of
thing. You will wait around for an hour then after they see you they will come
up with their usual useless reply, "get some advice from a solicitor".
This
is the "Agony Aunt" story as printed in the Guardian Newspaper. The replies are
a load of useless moralising with no practical suggestions at all; which was the
reason for my submission. The information in all these internet files is far
more useful to anyone in similar circumstances.
Guardian
Newspaper - Private Lives for 25 June 1999 Was
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0, 4273, 3878074, 00.html
If this article fails to emerge
from the Guardian archive then try clicking again.
Some further reading
that seems appropriate to Sheila's behaviour Bullying
A Social Services
exposure site
Exposure of bullying in a Kent hospital Kent institutionalised bullying
A UK site for exposing social workers Blundering Social Workers
Now on http://www.blunderingsocialworkers.tk
A
useful site for checking social worker registration details
Fatuous
comment about the above site
Ms Tucker knows full well that incompetant
social workers hide behind threats from their legal departments. She knows the
local government ombudsman will rarely look into complaints and that local and
national newspapers will not publish any material relating to such grievances.
Turning good money over to bloody lawyers in civil courts is not a valid
recourse. About the only outcome of legal nonsense is publicity so why not cut
out these expensive middlemen and go public from the outside. Publishing by the
agrieved themselves details of incompetance and misdeads of social workers is
thoroughly to be recommended for the public good as well as very necessary
cathartic reasons.
An eclectic mix of UK " naming and shaming " sites variously exposing
Liverpool Council
RSPCA
MFI
NHS
Currently unavailable but is
still available on the internet archive Mirror
of NHS exposed site
Local Government Ombudsman Watch www.ombudsmanwatch.org
An outline of Multiple Personality Disorder in
layman's terms MPD
A More technical exploration of Multiple Personality Disorder or DID
MPD
A collection of articles
concerning disputed paternity
Another example of the very strange
employment criteria of Wiltshire Social Services Guardian Newspaper Archive
Type in "keith andrews" as keyword and read articles of 04 May, 2000 and 06
Dec 2000 and 23 April, 2000.
Also another case of who is harassing who. Type
in "laura fish" published on 02 April, 2001
Someone else on a more
serious charge of child sexual abuse after false allegations. Curiously this
person's discontinuance notice from Wilts CPS was almost the same day as mine
February 26 2001 ; mine was February 27 2001 Wiltshire Newspapers
Archive Issue day 05 April 2001, title "Man's anger at sex abuse claim" , 46
year old Devizes man.
Another local case of Social Services incompetence
go to Echo Newspaper
and type in keywords collings gosport
About the only "text book " on
the 1997 Protection from Harassment act is The Law of Harassment and Stalking by
Paul Infield and Graham Platford published by Butterworths, 2000. It is available
inter-library loan from Aberystwyth University Library. It is useful for those
on the receiving end of stalking, hence the input from the Suzy Lamplugh Trust as
well as people finding themselves on the receiving end of the act used bogusly
as in the case of animal welfare activists etc. That is being used to stifle
public protest a concern of Liberty. The impetus for the act was the manifest
stalking of Tracy Morgan by Anthony Burstow.
A reported case where the
anti-stalking law was used for its intended purpose again a man being stalked by
a woman. Wiltshire
Harassment Case
The following is a link to another David versus
Goliath battle , this time with Dorset County Council, Social Services 3 Families
Exposing social services
Another
David v. Goliath Story from Dorset
Another example of social
services getting it spectacularly wrong. The Broxtowe Files
and
yet again this time Newcastle social services
Was http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0, 3604, 765857, 00.htm, 31 July 2002.
A good summary of
all the "Satanic Abuse " nonsense involving hoards of incompetent social
workers who go with what they believe and people they believe rather than any
proper evidence.
A TV movie - Indictment:The McMartin Trial 1995
Concerning a notorious 7 year trial of a family
falsely accused of child abuse , satanic and ritual
abuse with no evidence and just the input from
a dangerous "expert" social worker.
Newspaper of UK Social Work with a useful archive
facility Community Care
Another very
personal story
Another story of a
personal dispute with legal involvement
More law and relationships not mixing
British False Memory Society with
references to prosecutions of people after false allegations
The
case of Ashley Pittman
Hounded and Grounded
Flying Vet
Gordon Warren
Story of corruption within the Metropolitan Police oddly from an inside source
And another similar but more general site Police corruption from inside
sources
Someone else's site
concerning the under side of social services in Wiltshire
Jim Hulbert-Taxi Ride to
Censorship
Mark
Purdey versus MAFF etc If this article fails to emerge from the Guardian
archive then try clicking again.
There follows a random collection of
sites devoted to campaigning and publishing and fighting injustice, corruption,
unfairness etc.
Men's
and Father's Rights
Reports of
corruption in UK officialdom
To access this site now you have to go to
The Internet Archive Internet Archive and
type in vomit.cc
Lobster
magazine
Schnews- Brighton
, with an extensive list of links to campaigning groups
Transparancy International
Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK)
Stories of
political corruption
Counter
feminism
Scandals in Justice
Flying Fish
ZNet media
Squall Underground
Civil Liberties in Europe
Central TV, Roger Cook Report
The Mark Thomas Product
Global Internet Liberty Campaign
UK general community
action advice
Log of sites/files had taken down by the opposition in Wiltshire
Now only
readable by using the "Wayback Machine" The
Internet Archive and putting in the search box the original URL
20
Nov 2001
http://nutteing.freeservers.com
Hello Paul Nutteing, Your web
site is in violation of our Acceptable Use Policy. Specifically, your page
contained material or content that is racist or otherwise offensive to others,
including content which aggravates, harasses, threatens, defames, or abuses
others. If you have any questions, you may refer to our Acceptable Use Policy
located at http://www.freeservers.com/policies/acceptable_use.html. Regards,
Abuse Team
10 April
2002
http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm
Dear User, We have
received a number of complaints about the allegedly defamatory content of your
postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }. We must
remind you that the Freeserve user conditions subject to which Freeserve is made
available to you require you not to use Freeserve "to transmit or post any
material which is defamatory, offensive or of an obscene or menacing character,
or which may, in our judgement, cause annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety to any
person." Your postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }
put Freeserve at risk of libel proceedings and accordingly we will be suspending
your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm ) website as of 09:30
April{10}th 2002. However, if we receive your written undertaking that you will
remove the allegedly defamatory content from your website, then we will be happy
to reinstate your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2 ) website. Kind
Regards Freeserve Webmaster
UK
Regional newspaper campaigning
Powered by counter.bloke.com
Counter plus 1024